Valuing chronically ill graduate students

Tenure, She Wrote


Many states issue “special wage certificates that allow employers to pay disabled workers according to productivity rather than hours worked.” Working under these rules, a disabled person can expect to make less than $4/hour. Some people think paying disabled people less is a good thing, as shown by this response when Maryland ended sub-minimum wages for disabled people:

If a worker is less productive, should they be paid less? This is not an abstract question for me.

View original post 1,339 more words

Not Looking Away: A follow up to Jim Hines’ article

Content note: this post discusses harassment in general terms.

Jim Hines published a nice piece on Monday at io9 on sexual harassment in the SF/F community:

Don’t Look Away: Fighting Sexual Harassment in the Scifi/Fantasy Community

I encourage you to read this article. It is an important overview of a serious issue in our community and in our wider culture.  I’ve been deeply involved with addressing harassment (both sexual and non-sexual) as a ConCom member and part of the Anti-Abuse Team for WisCon.  In this post, however, I speak only for myself, not for the AAT or for WisCon; this is my personal blog.

I very much agree with most of Mr. Hines’ points.  Harassment is not a new probem, it is a big deal, and we must not tolerate it.  Creating and enforcing anti-harassment policies are an important step in addressing harassment and abuse at conventions and in our wider communities.

As he says, it also helps when authors and guests of honor speak out against bullying behaviors, as Nalo Hopkinson did in her WisCon 40 GoH speech:

My WisCon 2016 Guest of Honor Speech

It’s easy to encourage others to join your dogpile, to create an atmosphere of fear, anguish and self-doubt in your preferred victims. Yet it’s not a bad thing to urge people to question their own beliefs and behaviours. Anger and conflict have their uses. But what are we doing on the other side of the ledger? I’m hearing from far too many people who would love to be part of science fiction, but who are terrified of the bullying. So what are we doing to foster joy and welcome to this community? What are we doing to cultivate its health and vibrancy? What are we doing to create an environment in which imperfect people (as all people are) who are trying to be good people can feel encouraged and supported to take the risk of a misstep, perhaps learn from it, and come back refocussed and re-energized, eager to try again?

These are two tactics, and there are likely many other moves that we can take, if we think creatively and make creating safer spaces a priority.

There is one point in Mr. Hines’ post that I don’t agree with.

A 1997 study by Herff Moore and Don Bradley on sexual harassment policies in manufacturing firms found that the existence of a written harassment policy resulted in a 76 percent reduction in one year’s reports. Simply announcing that harassment will be taken seriously can reduce incidents of harassment.

I haven’t been able to read the 1997 paper by Moore and Bradly because it is pay walled.  It is published in the journal Industrial Management if anyone wants to look it up.  Mostly I question the equation of reports and incidents– Just because an incident happens doesn’t mean it gets reported.  But since I don’t have the paper handy, I’m going to write about my personal experiences at cons.

In my work, I have found the opposite of Moore and Bradley’s finding to be true: when you create a strong anti-harassment policy and beging to enforce it, reports will rise.  The number of incidents may stay the same– there is no way to know for sure because we, the con runners, are not all-knowing– but the reports con-runners receive will go up.  Why?  Because people feel safer reporting.  They begin to trust that someone has their back, and that reporting might actually do some good: the complete opposite of the way our culture usually treats reports of harassment, which is with means of silence, denial, and suppression.  It can take a while to turn around the great societal machinery, to shift from suppression of any discussion of harassment, to opening talking about and dealing with it.

From my own personal experience: my eyes have been opened.  I am now able to recognize bullying and inappropriate behaviors.  What seemed before to be merely strange, intensely awkward or upsetting things that I had to deal with myself (or, more accurately, ignore and repress as best as possible), I suddenly recognized as things I could talk to the safety or anti-abuse departments about.  An example was a member making unreasonable demands of me as Access Coordinator and being extremely rude.  In the past I would have just complained about this person to my friends and told my friends to avoid this person–this is called the “Whisper Network.” These days I make a report about such things so that Safety and Anti-Abuse can intervene and deal with such behaviors.  Incidents don’t have to be major to be reported and taken seriously; and letting your members know this is another reason you might see an increase in the number of reports.  This took a lot of reading and learning for me, and a lot of work on the part of bloggers and activists writing about their experiences, creating terms like gaslighting, mansplaining, microaggressions, etc.  Keep writing and talking about it.  Keep creating a world where we are safer speaking and interacting with each other.



Publicly available Slide show and notes on disability

I created a slide show and notes for and introduction to social model of disability.  This is suitable for tweens, teens, and up.  It is creative commons licensed.  Please feel free to provide feedback and to use these slides and ideas for your group (with attribution).  The slides and notes are on Google Drive.  My brother gave this talk (with some coaching from me) for his kids’ Boy Scout Troop, and it took about 20 minutes.


Disability Intro Slide Show


Notes on the Slide Show

Are You Well Read in SF/F?

Have you read the following core science fiction and fantasy books? The year listed is the year published and includes YA books.

  1. Dragonflight, Anne McCaffrey, 1968
  2. The Left Hand of Darkness, Ursula K. Le Guin, 1969
  3. A Wrinkle in Time, Madeleine L’Engle, 1973
  4. Kindred, Octavia Butler, 1979
  5. Psion, Joan Vinge, 1982
  6. Alanna: The first adventure (The Song of the Lionness series), Tamora Pierce, 1983
  7. Shards of Honor, Lois McMaster Bujold, 1986
  8. The Steerswoman, Rosemary Kerstein, 1989
  9. China Mountain Zhang, Maureen F. McHugh, 1992
  10. Ammonite, Nicola Griffith, 1993
  11. The Sparrow, Mary Doria Russell, 1996
  12. The Thief, Megan Whalen Turner, 1996
  13. Bellwether, Connie Willis, 1996
  14. Crown Duel, Sherwood Smith, 1997
  15. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, J.K. Rowling, 1997
  16. Ship of Magic, Robin Hobb, 1998
  17. Kushiel’s Dart, Jacqueline Carey, 2001
  18. The House of the Scorpion, Nancy Farmer, 2002
  19. Fire Logic, Laurie Marks, 2003
  20. Princess Academy, Shannon Hale, 2005
  21. Zarah the Windseeker, Nnedi Okorafor, 2005
  22. The Privilege of the Sword, Ellen Kushner, 2006
  23. Graceling, Kristin Cashore, 2008
  24. The Hunger Games, Suzanne Collins, 2008
  25. Liar, Justine Larbalestier, 2009
  26. Half World, Hiromi Goto, 2009
  27. The Hundred Thousand Kingdoms, N. K. Jemisin, 2010
  28. Among Others, Jo Walton, 2011
  29. Adaptation, Malida Lo, 2012
  30. The Summer Prince, Alaya Dawn Johnson, 2013

WisCon’s access expenditures

WisCon is a non-profit venture and our funds come from memberships.  So I think it’s appropriate to publish where the money goes, at least for my part.

I also see people decrying that access is too expensive for their event.  It may be cheaper than you think, at least in some areas.

The following are my best estimates although I’m not a finance person.

Print job for interaction badges:  83.08.  We cut them up ourselves and the graphic design was donated.
(I got 500 of each color and yet somehow we ran out of yellow and had to print more of those at registration).
500 paperclips for the badges 6.32
Food for disability lounge: 50.63
Blue tape: Zero dollars since we used leftovers from last year
Total supplies = 140.03

Captioning:  $1000 came from a service fund from the Office for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing from the State of Wisconsin, for which I am very grateful.  We spent an additional $2000 paying our excellent captionist and her assistant for the weekend.

SF3 (our governing body) also purchased a ramp as a long-term investment for our convention.  I do not know how much this cost and am not including it here; it shoud be a once-in-a-long-time expenditure and not part of a yearly budget.

Some expenditures such as signs and consuite contribute to access, while serving other functions, but they are not a part of our department. Access can be everywhere!  I shall attempt to keep focused.

If our budget is roughly $45,000 (~900 people times a 50 dollar membership –this is just a guess), then the total access expenditures listed above amount to about 4.8% of the total budget.

2,140 / 45,000  x 100 = 4.8

Put another way, this is about $2.40 out of your 50 dollar membership fee.

.048 x 50 = 2.4

Please correct me if I am wrong!  I will edit and fix!